PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MAKE A MATCH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN EXAMPLE NON EXAMPLE

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif eksperimen quasi. Bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar proses pembentukan tanah melalui model pembelajaran Make A Match (kelas eksperimen 1), model pembelajaran Example Non Example (kelas eksperimen 2), dan model pembelajaran konvensional (kelas kontrol). Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Batutulis 2 Kota Bogor. Pada Kelas VA, VB, dan VC Sekolah Dasar Negeri Batutulis 2 Kota Bogor pada bulan April, semester genap tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes pilihan ganda sebanyak 22 soal dengan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,84. Teknik analisis yang digunakan yaitu, uji prasyaratan analisis yang meliputi uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, kemudian dilakukan uji hipotesis dengan menggunakan uji t, maka: (1) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar proses pembentukan tanah melalui model pembelajaran Make A Match (eksperimen 1) dan model pembelajaran konvensional (kontrol). Hal ini dapat dilihat dari nilai rata-rata N-Gain pada kelompok eksperimen 1 sebesar 71, sedangkan pada kelas kontrol mendapatkan nilai rata-rata N-Gain sebesar 51,26. Serta hasil pengujian hipotesis menyatakan bahwa H_o ditolak dan H_a diterima: t_hitung > t_tabel (7,02 > 1,99656); (2) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar proses pembentukan tanah melalui model pembelajaran Example Non Example (eksperimen 2) dan model pembelajaran konvensional (kontrol). Hal ini dapat dilihat dari nilai rata-rata N-Gain pada kelompok eksperimen 2 sebesar 65,15, sedangkan pada kelas kontrol mendapatkan nilai rata-rata N-Gain sebesar 51,26. Serta hasil pengujian hipotesis menyatakan bahwa H_o ditolak dan H_a diterima: t_hitung > t_tabel (4,82 > 1,99601); dan (3) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar proses pembentukan tanah melalui model pembelajaran Make A Match (eksperimen 1) dan model pembelajaran Example Non Example (eksperimen 2). Hal ini dapat dilihat dari nilai rata-rata N-Gain pada kelompok eksperimen 1 sebesar 71, sedangkan pada kelas kontrol mendapatkan nilai rata-rata N-Gain sebesar 65,15. Serta hasil pengujian hipotesis menyatakan bahwa H_o ditolak dan H_a diterima: t_hitung > t_tabel (2,0744 > 1,99601). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian di atas, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Melalui Model Pembelajaran Make A Match dan Model Pembelajaran Example Non Example.

Kata kunci     : Hasil Belajar, Model Pembelajaran Make A Match, dan Model Pembelajaran Example Non Example.

ABSTRACT

This study is a quantitative quasi experiment. Aims to know the difference between the learning result of the soil formation process through the make a match learning model (experimental class1), the example non example model (experimental class 2), and the conventional learning model (control class). This research was conducted in the state primary school batutulis 2 bogor city. In va, vb, and vc class of public elementary school batutulis 2 bogor city in april, even semester of academic year 2016/2017. Instrument used in the form of multiple choice test as much as 22 problem with reliability coefficient equal to 0,84. The analytical technique used is the prerequisite analysis test which includes the normality test, homogeneity test, then tested the hypothesis by using t test, then: (1) there is difference of learning result of soil formation process through make a match learning model (experiment 1) and model Conventional learning (control). This can be seen from the average value of n-gain in experiment group 1 of 71, while in the control class get the average value of n-gain of 51.26. As well as the results of hypothesis testing states that h0 rejected and ha accepted: tcount> ttable (7.02> 1.99656); (2) there is a difference of learning result of soil formation process through learning mode example non example (experiment 2) and conventional learning model (control). This can be seen from the average value of n-gain in the experiment group 2 of 65.15, while in the control class get the average value of n-gain of 51.26. And the result of hypothesis testing stated that h0 rejected san ha accepted: tcount> ttable (4.82> 1.99601); And (3) there is a difference in the result of the soil formation process through the make a match learning model (experiment 1) and the example non example model (experiment 2). This can be seen from the average value of n-gain in experiment group 1 of 71, while in the control class get the average value of n-gain of 65.15. As well as the results of hypothesis testing states that h0 rejected and ha accepted: thitung> ttable (2.0744> 1.99601). Based on the results of the above research, it can be concluded that there are differences in learning outcomes of natural science through the mode of learning make a match and learning model example non example.

Keywords:  Learning outcomes, Make A Match learning model, and Example Non Example learning model.