Browse Title Index


 
Issue Title
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH MAKE A MATCH Abstract   Untitled
Ridha Hasti Wardani
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY THROUGH WHAT IS IT GAME Abstract   PDF
Vania Vania
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY TO WRITE NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH WRITE PAIR SHARE Abstract   PDF
Fera Agusferani
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 STUDENTS ABILITY IN TRANSFORMING A POEM INTO A NARRATIVE TEXT Abstract   PDF
Dwi Maulia Purwasih
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 TEACHERS DIFFICULTIES IN APPLYING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION IN ENGLISH CLASS Abstract   PDF
Apriliany Putri
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 TEACHING STRATEGIES IN ENCOURAGING YOUNG LEARNER PARTICIPATION IN AN ENGLISH CLASS Abstract   PDF
Putri Elvira Rosa
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN CROSS CRAWL AND THINKING CAPS BRAIN GYM ON STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION Abstract   PDF
Mia Andriani
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS? PRONUNCIATION ACHIEVEMENTAND THEIR ABILITY TO FIND THE RHYMES IN WILLIAM BLAKE’S POEM THE LITTLE BLACK BOY Abstract   PDF
Ella Arni Kusuma
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AND THEIR ABILITY TO MAKE INTENSIVE QUESTION Abstract   PDF
Siska Mahdika
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ UNDERSTNDING OF ENGLISH POEM AND THEIR ABITLITY TO TRANSFORM IT INTO NARRATIVE TEXT Abstract   PDF
Mega Nastasia Aryani
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF BOOKWORM ADVENTURES GAME ON STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ENRICHMENT Abstract   PDF
Firda Pebriyani
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO SUMMARIZE THE TEXT Abstract   PDF
Selly Dara Puspita
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF GRAFFITI TECHNIQUE ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH Abstract   PDF
Herna Susanti
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF INSIDE OUTSIDE CIRCLE ON STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING ON SIMPLE PAST TENSE Abstract   PDF
Sri Rizkiyana
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF MESSAGE SECRET GAME ON STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ENRICHMENT Abstract   PDF
Nuni Tri Wahyuni
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF TWO STAY TWO STRAY ON STUDENTS’ READING ABILITY Abstract   PDF
Hasunatun Munawaroh
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF USING FOUR SQUARE WRITING METHOD ON STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL Abstract   PDF
Juatania Juatania
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE EFFECT OF “DORA THE EXPLORER” MOVIE ON STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION Abstract   PDF
Devi Nurdiani
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR THE STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS AND FACULTY OF LAW Abstract   PDF
Jessica Setiawan
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 THE INFLUENCE OF USING “SPOT THE DIFFERENCES” TECHNIQUE ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT COMPARATIVE PARAGRAPH Abstract   PDF
Ageng Sartika Dewi
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 TYPE OF ENGLISH NEEDED BY TOURISM STUDENTS IN TOUR GUIDING SUBJECT Abstract   PDF
Eka Dewi Yusmana
 
Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Tahun 2016 Writing is one skill that plays important rule in education. Through writing students can be creative in showing everything that they keep in their mind in the written way. Some of them have difficulties in developing their ideas, especially to summarize the text. The teachers can use many strategy in teaching writing that can help the students solve their problems. Therefore, the writer conducted the research about The Effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Strategy on Students’ Ability to Summarize The Text. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) strategy on students’ ability to summarize the text. The writer used quasy experimental design control group pre-test post-test, so there are two groups in this research. The result of this research shows that tcomputed for summarizing the text is 0.51 with df 68 while the result of ttable in the level of significant t0.05 = 1.671 and t0.01 = 2.390. It can be shown that 0.51<1.671 and 0.51<2.390. it means that tcomputed is lower than ttable, so the alternative hypthesis Ha is rejected and null hypothesis Ho is accepted. Therefore, the writer concludes that there is no effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) strategy on students’ ability to summarize the text. Abstract   PDF
Sevty Purwaningsih
 
26 - 47 of 47 Items << < 1 2